Thing 18--Google Documents for productivity

I discovered Google documents a while ago, as I am a completely devoted fan of Gmail. It's been fairly useful when I've had to do some documents with my daughter in Japan. However, as I discovered when I did my ALA schedule in their spreadsheet, they do not play all that well with others. It was a ton of work to export a spreadsheet usable in Excel, or even as an email attachment. So it's just great if you are going to be working with a document in a web-based online environment, but may not be the solution for all business needs.

That said, it's a whole lot cheaper than licenses for Microsoft Office, and it doesn't take up a ton of room on your hard drive. I've also used it to park some really large attachments that I didn't want to save in email.It does that very nicely and seamlessly.

I hadn't really used Google Docs since July, so it didn't fill a crucial need for me. But I can imagine library customers finding it very useful. The sharing thing is particularly great for students doing short-term team projects.

I notice I do not have the ability to attach or insert a Google doc here--that might be a good direction for them?

Thing 1.b

Going back to check on what Things I had and had not done so far (tick, tick), I saw I had never posted anything about the Web 2.0 class I took. It was Web 2.0: How to Teach the Public about Social Software with Instructor: Beth Gallaway. I enjoyed the class. The most useful thing I took away was getting people to create their usernames and passwords before they go to register on a site. There was also a snazzy handout on thinking outside the box--I have to dig it out.

Of the sites Beth showed us, the one that's had the farthest reaching consequences has been LinkedIn.
I've gotten in touch with all kinds of people through LinkedIn, including my former assistant froma library in NYC in 1994-95. It's been really great getting back in touch with her!

I'm still not to sure about teaching social software in classes. I usually help people one-on-one who want to set up email accounts. I can't really see doing much more--our public computers are too locked down to allow downloading or uploading. We'll have to see if there is a desire for more.

Et tu, YouTube? Thing 20.0

I've spent the last year saying, "I have no time for YouTube." But I bopped over to play, per 23 Things. I was not deeply impressed when I clicked on some of the featured videos. I'm not a big fan of TV to begin. I looked at the subject directory. I watched some so-called funny videos. At best, I found them disturbing. So I searched for something I would like to watch, and found the above clip of Patti Smith on Saturday Night Live. I greatly enjoyed it. But when I looked for the date of the filming, or the source, I couldn't find anything. I found the info quite easily via Google--it aired on SNL April 17, 1976. I watched it with my best friend Eric in my parent's den in suburban Philly.

I'm assuming there's no meta-data because this clip is protected by copyright, which is being violated. I'm sure Patti doesn't have a problem, but I bet NBC does. I looked at the comments, thinking they might be interesting. They weren't; mostly sophomoric. They did not add to the content.

I surfed a bit more. Some of the videos do give meta-data, but it's very uneven, which makes the searching uneven.

I must say embedding the clip in Blogger was VERY easy, and that video clips can make web sites more interesting. But I will probably never be very interested in YouTube as a social interaction--just not my thing.

My biggest surprise: when I went to email the clip to my daughter, I had to sign in. It said my preferred username was taken! So I tried my default password, and lo and behold, I already had set up a YouTube account. No recollection of when or why, but there it was. YouTube says I joined 11/30/2006, and have watched 3 videos. Maybe it was that Book 1.0 video? It's here--if you haven't seen it, do--hilarious

Thing 16 & 17

I have a little experience with wikis. I contributed to the ALA conference wikis in 2005 and 2006, and I have contributed to Library Success: A Best Practices Wiki . These have been such good experiences, that I have decided to add a "Meredith Farkas" tag to my collection.

Just recently, Jenne Bergstrom set up a wiki for the SDCL reference committee. That was a brilliant idea! I'm happy to say I have contributed!

I have indeed edited the InfoPeople wiki. I don't know if they really wanted a link to the Lakeside Library flickr page, but they've got one!

Thing 15--a little leit reading, wince

15. Read a few perspectives on Web 2.0, Library 2.0 and the future of libraries and blog your thoughts.

I started by reading the Wikipedia article on Web 2.0. Here's the bits I found most interesting, or at least most worthy of snipping:

"It’s actually an idea that the reciprocity between the user and the provider is what’s emphasized. In other words, genuine interactivity if you like, simply because people can upload as well as download"—S. Fry

business embracing the web as a platform and utilising its strengths

o The web as a platform
o Data as the driving force
o Network effects created by an architecture of participation
o Innovation in assembly of systems and sites composed by pulling together features
from distributed, independent developers (a kind of "open source" development)
o Lightweight business models enabled by content and service syndication
o The end of the software-adoption cycle (the so-called perpetual beta)
o Software above the level of a single device, leveraging the power of the "Long
Tail"
o Ease of picking-up by early adopters

This seems like ideas that for most libraries aren't realistic. Our ILS systems seem like the opposite of Web 2.0, in my experience. There are now open source ILS in development and in use, but I don't think any large public library systems have joined that particular bandwagon.

On to Cites & Insights Library 2.0 and "Library 2.0". First I have to say how thrilling it was for me to be able to print a 32-page issue of C&I and read it and mark it up with a highlighter ON MPOW's DIME. I've been reading it rather irregularly for about can-it-be six years? But always printing and sharing with at least three people, or not printing...so this was the height of luxury, in my mind.

Walt (I get to call him that because I do know him) really looks at the rather intense storm that gripped the biblioblogosphere in late 2005 early 2006. I can remember reading some of those posts at the time, and thinking people weren't defining their terms very well. In some ways, I think someone got it right when they said "Library 2.0" would become so 2005.

I think Walt is correct in seeing the concepts of Library 2.0 as being useful if they allow us to examine new technology and how it can strengthen our services to our users. However, implementing "Library 2.0" willynilly for some "revolution" will not serve us or our users well at all.

Reading the statements Walt gathered and his commentary made me think more about this course. Why is Infopeople doing this? Are they jumping on a bandwagon. I'm going to muse about this a bit more in my final post! Walt may come off a little curmudgeonly, but his careful and thorough analysis is whipped up with wonderful dry wit. So, for me, reading his 32-page perspective (and skewering of some biblioblogosphere bigwigs) was fun!

Thing 14 Technorati

public libraries

I don't quite know what this tag will do--it was on the Technorati home page, saying "See your posts here. To contribute to this page, include this code in your blog post:" Now it doesn't seem to work. Oh well, I tried.

I have not been very happy with my searches in Technorati--searching by tags seems too open to interpretation. When I tried Lakeside and California, I got LOTS of hits about speeding tickets!

I didn't find a way to really understand "authority" in Technorati. The number of blogs that link to another blog seems to be a key component. However, the fact that my "home" blog appears on some other bloggers' blogrolls does not add to it's importance in my mind...

I found it more interesting/useful to look at Statscounter, which I discovered via Rule the Web, which I subscribed to via RSS after reading about it here. Or maybe it was by email? In any case, I think Technorati is probably more important for people working in journalism, advertising, entertainment, etc. I don't think libraryland is as concerned about how many read and link to how many.

Thing 19

I am ridiculously proud of myself. Though prouder of figuring out how to do a screen capture on my boyfriend's iMac than anything else.

My MacBook is in the shop! Much wailing and gnashing of teeth. However, the Things continue!

MyMaps
in Google was fun. I actually do want to do a more detailed map of the
Lakeside environs, print them in color, and give them away. This would
be a HUGE service to new residents. There are no good freebie maps of
Lakeside. I have a very elderly advertising one at the reference desk
that I guard with my life. I am very excited about having something
better!

I did not find it easy to insert the picture. I could
not get rich text to work at all. I had to use HTML, which I could
manage because I did HTML coding A LOT many moons ago. However, it is
not intuitive, and not my favorite flavor. I also didn't realize that I
had to click on the libraryplacemark/balloon thingie to view the
picture. I am betting that's where someone (I think it was Ellen) had
the problem on Saturday. I am NOT logging in to Outlook Web Access from
home on my day off THIS TIME to check. I will check at work tomorrow,
and let her know. At least I hope that's the solution. In any case,
there's another out of order Thing completed. More to come later this
week.

I will also unveil having FINALLY found one dimly interesting use for twitter. Stay tuned!

Note: I somehow broke the Blogger html while I was editing the post. So I published, the had to re upload to get it right. Grrrrr.